2% The Two Percent Company
[ - ]
| Large Type Edition |
[ - ]
[ - ]
| Navigate the Rants




Categories

Special Collections
|
[ - ]
[ - ]
|
Subscribe to the
2%Co Rants:



Syndicate this site:
ATOM
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
|
[ - ]
[ - ]
| The Usual Suspects
On Hiatus
Carnivals
Carnival of the Godless
Skeptics' Circle
Tangled Bank

Gone But Not Forgotten
Lost to the Mists of Time
|
[ - ]
[ - ]
| Archives (Weekly)
% 2016.11.06 » 2016.11.12
% 2009.04.05 » 2009.04.11
% 2009.03.15 » 2009.03.21
% 2009.03.08 » 2009.03.14
% 2009.03.01 » 2009.03.07
% 2009.02.15 » 2009.02.21
% 2009.01.25 » 2009.01.31
% 2009.01.18 » 2009.01.24
% 2009.01.04 » 2009.01.10
% 2008.12.21 » 2008.12.27
% 2008.11.16 » 2008.11.22
% 2008.11.09 » 2008.11.15


Archives (Monthly)
% 2016 November
% 2009 April
% 2009 March
% 2009 February
% 2009 January
% 2008 December
% 2008 November
% 2008 October
% 2008 September
% 2008 July
% 2008 June
% 2008 April
% 2008 January
% 2007 November
% 2007 October
% 2007 August
% 2007 July
% 2007 June
% 2007 May
% 2007 April
% 2007 March
% 2007 February
% 2007 January
% 2006 December
% 2006 November
% 2006 October
% 2006 September
% 2006 August
% 2006 July
% 2006 June
% 2006 May
% 2006 April
% 2006 March
% 2006 February
% 2006 January
% 2005 December
% 2005 November
% 2005 October
% 2005 September
% 2005 August
% 2005 July
% 2005 June
% 2005 May
% 2005 April
% 2005 March
% 2005 February
% 2005 January
% 2004 December
|
[ - ]
[ - ]
|
« Eau d'Mars The RantsHellza Poppins! »

The Christmas Armistice
2006.12.13 (Wed) 23:42

We really weren't going to bother this year, but Rockstar spoke up, and we're not ones to shrink from popular demand (especially when the demand comes from a demographic of one). Rockstar asked:

Where's my annual "War on Xmas" rant?

Where, indeed? Usually, our spider sense starts tingling sometime around Halloween as the Ridiculous Right begins pull-starting their two-cycle propaganda engines in anticipation of a season of pretend persecution. This year...not so much. Sure, we've seen the regular red herrings of the season, and we've heard a little bit of whining from the usual thickheaded suspects, but even Bill O'Reilly — he of the thickest head of all — seems to be phoning it in this year, given his gratuitous use of the phrase "gearing up for the holidays" on his own show (followed by a moment of horrible recognition and a botched scramble to recover). We're happy to say that, compared to the last two years, this year is damn near blissfully quiet. So the short answer: the War on Christmas is apparently in the midst of a tenuous cease fire. Kind of.

Smug motherfuckers, huh?

No, we don't mean that the religious nutjobs have stopped complaining about the phrase "Happy Holidays" or that they have ceased their demands that we must all be buried up to our nipples in the trappings of a Super-Christy Christmas season. Nor do we mean that they have "won" their battle, guaranteeing the religious sanctity of Christmas in the hearts and minds of secular America. No, it's much simpler than that. Take, for example, the following story:
This holiday season, Wal-Mart isn't trumpeting big bargains only. It's also bringing "Christmas" back into its marketing, after several years of playing down the term.

Wal-Mart Stores Inc.'s Christmas cheer seems to be a hot trend this season as several other retailers including Kohl's Corp. and Macy's, a division of Federated Department Stores Inc., are also stepping up their Christmas marketing. The moves respond to mounting criticism from religious groups that staged boycotts against Wal-Mart and other merchants after they eliminated or de-emphasized "Christmas" in their advertising.

...

Wal-Mart said Thursday that it will launch its first Christmas-specific TV ad in several years, feature Christmas shops, previously called Holiday Shops, and increase the number of seasonal merchandise labeled "Christmas" instead of "holiday" by 60 percent.

All right, religiosos, settle down. Because despite your confident assurance that you're finally "winning" the fictitious War on Christmas, you don't seem to realize the real winner here: basic freedom and civil liberties.

In our own Rants on this topic (such as our focus on lying sack of shit Bill O'Reilly), we've discussed why the whole concept of the War on Christmas was a crock. The rabid zealots and rabblerousers painted it thusly: the move by most major retail outlets and other private commercial interests away from emblazoning "Merry Christmas" on their properties and toward displaying the much more innocuous "Happy Holidays" on their properties is some sort of mass conspiracy to rob Christians of their rightful place on top of the American food chain.

The truth is much simpler: the people in charge of these commercial interests felt that it was better for business to be inclusive of all potential consumers as opposed to just a portion — however sizable — of their consumer base. Rather than pandering to the Christian sense of entitlement, they played the odds and did what they had to do in order to keep the business coming in. There was no conspiracy. There was no malicious intent. There was no War on Christmas.

Now, all that said, Wal-Mart is a privately owned corporation. They are not restricted by the separation of church and state, for the very simple reason that they aren't the state. Therefore, if they want to say "Happy Holidays," or switch back to "Merry Christmas," or even go with "Joyous Fucking Reacharound Day," it's entirely up to them. We personally wouldn't recommend that last; while it would certainly entertain us enough that we might shop at Wal-Mart, we doubt it would play so well in Peoria. But the fact remains, they get to say what they want, period...

...and this goes both ways. That is, when they switched from "Merry Christmas" to "Happy Holidays," the Christian fundies had no fucking leg to stand on when they cried "persecution." It was Wal-Mart's choice. Now that they're switching back to "Merry Christmas" again, we won't be complaining, for the very same damn reason — it's Wal-Mart's choice.

So who won the War on Christmas? Civil liberties won; the Wal-Mart brass have demonstrated that they are fully capable of making their own decisions regarding their own business practices. Capitalism won; the move back to "Merry Christmas" on the part of major outfits like Kohl's and Macy's proves once again that the free market is just that — free. The Christians won; Wal-Mart and others will be giving them what they want, specially picking them out for some grand honor like giving the noisy kid at the Burger King a gold-colored paper crown. And, believe it or not, rational civil libertarians won; for one thing, we won't have to hear so many complaints from the fundies, and for another, we won because civil liberties won.

The point of our republic, which emphasizes civil liberties for its citizens, is to let any private concern do what they feel like, as long as they're not screwing with another private concern. By private concern, we mean both individuals and privately-held corporations. Wal-Mart's switch to "Happy Holidays" upholds this principle; their switch back to "Merry Christmas" upholds this principle. Christians choosing not to shop at a "Happy Holidays" establishment upholds this principle; Christians choosing to shop at a "Merry Christmas" establishment upholds this principle. The free market, both in the sense of allowing corporations to determine their own practices and in the sense of allowing consumers to make their own decisions on patronage, upholds this principle. So as long as the government isn't getting into the act, as long as Christians aren't forcing "Merry Christmas" down our throats and we're not forcing "Happy Holidays" down theirs, this principle is upheld, and civil liberties win.

Here's an analogy that might bring it home for you: it may arguably have been a bad PR move for Danny DeVito to show up at The View totally fucking plastered, but assuming he's not breaking any laws (he probably had a limo and a driver), he's perfectly welcome to do so. Likewise, it may arguably be a bad PR move for Wal-Mart to switch back to "Merry Christmas," but they're perfectly welcome to do so, too.

So to any Christian readers who buy into this silly crock of shit, here's the bottom line: if believing that you've won the make-believe War on Christmas is what it takes for us to stop hearing about the make-believe War on Christmas, then go right ahead and believe it. Hey, you're all experts at clinging to vacuous belief systems despite mountains of facts to the contrary, so this proposition should be no trouble at all. And if you can keep your pie holes shut for another two weeks, maybe we can all enjoy the holidays this year.


— • —
[  Filed under: % Civil Liberties  % Religion  % Two Percent Toons  ]

Comments (7)

Akusai, 2006.12.14 (Thu) 02:52 [Link] »

I made a similar post a couple of weeks ago. It's amazing the power of unbelievable blowhards like Bill O'Reilly to rally the ignorant masses. Christians are always looking to be persecuted, and he pandered to that. I guess a history of martyrdom will do that to you.



RRyan, 2006.12.14 (Thu) 09:56 [Link] »

LOL. I asked because in our local paper, the Lincoln Redneck, I've read about 10 letters to the editor re: "religious protesters" trying to take the Christ out of Christmas.

I tolerate your belief in ancient mythology. You can believe in a magical man in the sky who sent his ghost to get whipped by Romans, get killed and come back to life.

You can also believe in a magical man in the sky who had many children, some of them with humans, who will shoot a bolt of lightning up your ass if you go wrong.

Believe what you want; have a Tittyfucking Christ-y Christmas and a very Christ-y Christ.

But do not ask me to hold your stupid beliefs in the same reverance. That I will not do.



The Retropolitan, 2006.12.14 (Thu) 12:41 [Link] »

They're just keeping quiet until they can launch the War on New Year's.



The Two Percent Company, 2006.12.14 (Thu) 20:10 [Link] »

Spot on, Akusai. All we want to know is how you know so much about our families? Thanks for at least changing the names to protect the dysfunctional. Uncle Mel and Aunt Frida would be mortified to see their names in print...again. Plus we're pretty sure that they have some kind of exclusivity clause in their Jerry Springer contract.

Based on Ryan's report from the field, it sounds like some of the troops haven't gotten the "cease fire" message yet. To be fair, they probably haven't got anything remotely worthwhile to do with their time, anyway. If they weren't writing those whiny letters to the editor about how the Big Bad Secularists are persecuting them, what they hell would they do? Proselytize? Yikes. Better to keep 'em writing.

As for a War on New Year's, that's just silly. Everyone knows that New Year's Eve is a Christian holiday. Think about it — without the concept of "sin," how would anyone know what to do on New Year's Eve? And without "redemption," how would they know what promises to make for the coming year? And what "new year" is it, anyway? That's right, the one on the Gregorian calendar. Gregorian, Pope Gregory...Christian through and through. Nobody had ever thought of "years" before the Christians. It's a solid, Bill O'Reilly-approved fact that Jews and Muslims don't even celebrate birthdays, because what non-Christian knows what the heck year it is? And who do you think Rankin and Bass' cute little Baby New Year really is? Why, the baby Jesus, of course! See the connection? Man, not even we would try to take that holiday away from Baby "New Year" Jesus. We'd make god cry.



Akusai, 2006.12.17 (Sun) 11:28 [Link] »
All we want to know is how you know so much about our families?

See, here's the thing. I'm part of a secret section of the government, bankrolled with black funds, which makes sure that the American government sees all, knows all, and can do all. I helped design the hologram projectors that disguised cruise missiles as planes on 9/11, I helped manufacture evidence for the Holocaust, and I was even on hand to help fake Elvis' death, so it was trivial to spy on your family gatherings for my own sadistic amusement.

Or it could be that I have psychic powers of remote viewing. Take your pick.



Glintir, 2006.12.21 (Thu) 17:25 [Link] »
See, here's the thing. I'm part of a secret section of the government, bankrolled with black funds, which makes sure that the American government sees all, knows all, and can do all.

Santa?
I want a Red Rider BB Gun with a compass in the stock.



Akusai, 2006.12.22 (Fri) 05:40 [Link] »

You'll shoot your eye out, kid.




— • —

|
[ - ]


Terms of Use — • — Privacy Policy — • — FAQ
[ - ]
| Protecting our Civil Liberties
ACLU
EFF: Support Bloggers' Rights!
Individual-i

Bullshit Busters
JREFSkeptic's Dictionary
QuackwatchSnopes.com
SymantecMcAfee
SophosSnopes.com

|
[ - ]
[ - ]
|
|
[ - ]
[ - ]
|
Buy 2%Co Products
2%Co Stores


Visit the 2%Co Wish List
|
[ - ]
[ - ]
|
|
[ - ]
[ - ]
|
|
[ - ]
[ - ]
| Where can you find 2%Co?

Site MeterGlobe of Blogs
Atheism OnlineThe Truth Laid Bear
BlogwiseBlogarama
BlogsharesTechnorati

2%Co Search Rankings

Link to our Rants
2%Co Rants


Link to our Allison DuBois: Debunked! collection
Allison DuBois: Debunked! (2%Co)


The 2%Co Rants powered by
MovableType
|
[ - ]