« Golfing with God • The Rants • Skeptics' Circle #14, Carnival of the Godless #19 & #20 »
Catching Up on Frist's Stem Cell Announcement
2005.08.03 (Wed) 16:48
Just about a week ago, Senate Majority leader and well-known nutbag Bill Frist split with President Bush, and declared his support for the recently proposed stem cell legislation. Admittedly, we didn't see this coming. From an AP article on ABC News:
Last month Frist, a prominent heart and lung surgeon, said he did not support expanded federal financing of stem cell research. He says he now believes the research is promising and deserves federal funding, if the embryos are collected in an "ethically considerate" way.
"I'm doing this as somebody who has convictions," Frist told "GMA." "This is not about politics. It is about policy. It is about principle. It is about human life."
Frist said he remains firm on his pro-life stance, and his support of stem cell research does not contradict his views on abortion.
"I give huge moral significance to the human embryo. It is nascent human life," he said. "What that means is that as we advance science, we treat that embryo with dignity, with respect."
Frist said only embryos that would otherwise be discarded should be used for the research. Those that could be adopted or implanted would not be used.
In 2001, Bush announced that the government should pay only for research of stem cell colonies, or lines, that were created by that date where the "life or death" decision already had been made. At the time there were 78 lines available, but genetic problems and other difficulties currently leave just 22 available for research.
Frist said even the remaining 22 lines were not fit for "human therapy," and therefore Bush's policy should be revised. He will support a bill sponsored by Democratic Sen. Tom Harkin of Iowa, a version of which the House has already passed, which allows federal research on stem cell lines created after 2001.
"While human embryonic stem cell research is still at a very early stage, the limitations put in place in 2001 will, over time, slow our ability to bring potential new treatments for certain diseases," the Tennessee lawmaker said in his speech. "Therefore, I believe the president's policy should be modified."
Bush has said he will veto the bill.
We don't know what Frist's motives are for this move. Some have suggested that he is doing it in order to court the non-zealot moderate voters in his bid for the 2008 presidency, but the fact that he will piss off the religious whackjob contingent that ushered Bush into office in 2004 makes this seem — to us, anyway — like a pretty big gamble. As a good illustration of what we mean, you can see lots of moronic, reactionary stupidity over at WorldNetDaily. There's plenty there, but the one piece we want to repeat is the second paragraph below:
Pro-life leaders lashed back at Republican Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist today after his decision to break with President Bush and support legislation to remove some of the administration's limitations on funding of embryonic stem cell research.
Focus on the Family Action founder James Dobson, noting Frist is a possible 2008 presidential candidate, said that if the policy change is for political purposes, the senator has "gravely miscalculated."
While most of the crap in the article is your typical far-right diatribe, we tend to agree with Dobson's statement above. After all, if Frist was courting the non-zealot voter — that's us, and we still think he's a nutbag. After all he's done (Justice Sunday, anyone?) we wouldn't vote Frist for president of the Gilmore Girls Fan Club, let alone President of the United States.
Some might call Frist's motive a sudden fit of "intellectual honesty," but we're not buying it. This is the man who, despite repeated and incredulous questioning from George Stephanopolous, refused to confirm the simple fact that the HIV virus cannot be transmitted through tears — while pushing his views on abstinence only sex "education." Way to educate, there, Bill.
At any rate, based on Frist's shift of support, the Senate is speculating that they may be able to cobble together enough support to garner the 2/3 majority needed to roll past Bush's threatened veto. Overall, "veto-proofing" is still a longshot, due to lack of support in the House; but if by some stretch Frist's move leads to the passage of this stem cell bill, we'll be very thankful indeed that in one narrow area, his agenda (whatever it was or is) happened to coincide with ours.
But not thankful enough to vote for the freak.
— • —
[ Filed under: % Government & Politics % Science & Technology ]
Comments (11)
Shawn McCormick, 2005.08.05 (Fri) 09:49 [Link] »
Grendel, 2005.08.05 (Fri) 13:40 [Link] »
Tom from the Two Percent Company, 2005.08.07 (Sun) 19:31 [Link] »
MBains, 2005.08.08 (Mon) 06:11 [Link] »
The Two Percent Company, 2005.08.08 (Mon) 23:06 [Link] »
Grendel, 2005.08.09 (Tue) 10:27 [Link] »
Tom from the Two Percent Company, 2005.08.10 (Wed) 14:35 [Link] »
Grendel, 2005.08.10 (Wed) 14:58 [Link] »
Tom from the Two Percent Company, 2005.08.10 (Wed) 15:48 [Link] »
Grendel, 2005.08.10 (Wed) 19:17 [Link] »
Tom from the Two Percent Company, 2005.08.13 (Sat) 16:45 [Link] »
— • —
|