« DNA Lives Forever, DNA Learns How to Fly (High) • The Rants • Skeptics' Circle #45 »
Or Did They Not Mean It This Way...?
2006.10.11 (Wed) 22:32
On the way to lunch today, it occurred to us that, if a Flag Protection Amendment was to be written into the Constitution, then all of the people who mounted cloth flags on their cars should clearly be charged with flag desecration. You know who we're talking about: all those foul-weather patriots who were inspired by the events of 9/11 to adorn their Hondas and Toyotas with American flags, only to have the airflow around their moving vehicles rip those flags to shreds.
But, one might say, the people with flags on their cars are true patriots, supporting the spirit of what the United States stands for by displaying their flags. Well, we would retort, the people who might burn the flag in protest — for example, against the United States' approval of torture — are also supporting the spirit of what the United States stands for. Both forms of free expression happen to result in a piece of red, white and blue fabric being damaged, and, if that damage is stupidly deemed illegal, then either of these illustrative patriots should be punished equally. After all, the Flag Protection Amendment makes it clear that it isn't the message that's important — it's the piece of cloth.
We previously thought that the ultimate irony would be to pass an amendment protecting a piece of cloth while shitting all over the very freedoms that piece of cloth is meant to represent. However, we now see that having to arrest scores of people with torn flags on their cars — some of whom are likely the key Republican demographic, and some of whom are likely big supporters of a Flag Protection Amendment — would be far, far more ironic.
— • —
[ Filed under: % Civil Liberties % Government & Politics ]
Comments (2)
Infophile, 2006.10.14 (Sat) 17:36 [Link] »
Jason Spicer, 2006.10.16 (Mon) 18:53 [Link] »
— • —
|