« State of the Union: There's Nothing to See Here • The Rants • Skeptics' Circle #27, Carnival of the Godless #33 »
Welcome to the Asylum. Population: Way Too Many
2006.02.05 (Sun) 01:00
You stupid, fucking, narrow-minded, hateful, deluded, morons:
Several thousand Syrian demonstrators set the Danish and the Norwegian embassies on fire on Saturday to protest at the publishing of cartoons of the Prophet Mohammad by European newspapers.
Chanting "God is Greatest," the protesters stormed the embassy; threw stones and shattered its windows; burned the national flag and replaced it with another flag reading "No God but Allah, Mohammad is His Prophet".
This whole fucking thing is sick. All of this bitching, and complaining, and condemnation, and violence over some fucking cartoons. If this is an indication of the extraordinarily loose grip on reality that these fucking assholes have thanks to their wonderful religion...fuck, we can't even think of any way to finish this sentence.
In case you aren't aware, this whole uproar is due to a handful of cartoons depicting Mohammed, the Muslim prophet, being published in Danish and Norwegian newspapers. That's right, fucking cartoons. Why were the cartoons published?
The drawings were commissioned by the Jyllands-Posten (Jutland's Post) to accompany an article on self-censorship and freedom of speech after Danish writer Kare Bluitgen was unable failed to find artists willing to illustrate his children's book about Mohammed for fear of violent attacks by extremist Muslims.
Islamic teachings forbid pictorial depictions of Mohammed.
The cartoons were published on September 30 with an explanatory article by the newspaper's culture editor, Flemming Rose.
The following is a translated summary of the article and explanation of the cartoons published in the Internet encyclopedia Wikipedia.
"The modern, secular society is rejected by some Muslims. They demand a special position, insisting on special consideration of their own religious feelings.
"It is incompatible with contemporary democracy and freedom of speech, where you must be ready to put up with insults, mockery and ridicule.
Just because you harbor an irrational, delusional, all-consuming belief in some fucking imaginary god and his sidekick doesn't give you the right to impose that belief on others, and threaten violence and death against those who disagree with your brand of insanity. Not to mention the incredible blend of egocentricity and stupidity necessary to condemn a cartoon as something that doesn't properly respect the rights of others, then to show your displeasure by fucking firebombing a building. Think of the balls it takes for a person whose defining characteristic is raving intolerance to demand not only universal tolerance but ultimate respect from all people under threat of death. Does anyone really think that our world wouldn't be better off without these assholes?
Let's recap here. Here's one example of the cartoons in question:
And here's a picture of the reaction by some Muslims, the first from a London demonstration, and the second from the embassy attack mentioned above:
In short: "If you insult Islam, we will massacre and exterminate you." Fucking loons.
And what's the reaction of the United States, the supposed bastion of free expression?
"We all fully recognize and respect freedom of the press and expression but it must be coupled with press responsibility," [State Department spokesman Justin] Higgins told AFP.
"Inciting religious or ethnic hatreds in this manner is not acceptable. We call for tolerance and respect for all communities and for their religious beliefs and practices."
How, you may ask, does a cartoon incite religious hatred unless the people who see the cartoon are fucking unstable loons to begin with? Perhaps — and we're just spitballing here — the people we should be condemning are the ones threatening and/or actually carrying out violence against cartoonists, diplomats, and Europeans. Instead of the rest of the world taking a stand by explaining that it isn't the cartoons that won't be tolerated, but rather the violence perpetrated by religious nuts, the rest of the world seems to be all ready to perform a PC-inspired bow before a bunch of unstable and violent lunatics at the expense of free expression. Talk about sending the wrong fucking message.
In fact, we touched on this kind of scenario once before in our post titled "Let's Get Some Perspective on Quran Desecration." You might recall that claims of Qurans being flushed down the toilet by US Marines touched off a similar round of rhetoric and violence, which we found just as insane as these latest attacks. In particular, we took exception to the attitude inherent in this batshit crazy quote we found in a Newsweek follow up:
"We can understand torturing prisoners,
no matter how repulsive," says computer teacher Muhammad Archad,
interviewed last week by NEWSWEEK in Peshawar, Pakistan, where one of
last week's protests took place. "But insulting the Qur'an is like
deliberately torturing all Muslims. This we cannot tolerate."
As we said then:
Now that is some fucked up shit. Can anyone say "get your priorities straight, moron"? Let's spell this out — this guy values a book more highly than he does human life and well being. Does anyone think that's normal or sane? And we don't want to hear about "religious tolerance" or "understanding the belief systems of others" — valuing a book more than a person is batshit insane. You want someone to blame for the rioting deaths? How about the crazy fanatics who rioted and killed people over the mistreatment of a fucking book.
Those sentiments apply perfectly here, as well. Saying that the act of drawing and publishing a fucking cartoon makes violence acceptable is insane, plain and simple. Seriously, fuckwads — it's a goddamn cartoon. Let's even pretend, just for a moment, that your ridiculously stupid embargo on images of Mohammad make sense — even in this Bizarro world we're assuming for the sake of argument, this is a cartoon. The only reason you consider this to be an "image of Mohammad" is because of: a) the context, and b) the fact that you were told it is Mohammad. Look at the fucking thing! What if we told you that this...
...is Mohammad? Ooh! Did we just fuck your entire society of zealots up the ass and force you to eat pork? No. We drew a fucking smiley-face with a beard. It's called "perspective," you fucking assholes. Go fuck yourselves.
And don't think that this is a phenomenon relegated to "those crazy Muslims." If we repeat one of the quotes from above and just replace a single word, it'll sound oddly familiar to many rational Americans (a fact we're sure didn't escape your attention):
"The modern, secular society is rejected by some [Christians]. They demand a special position, insisting on special consideration of their own religious feelings.
In case you don't know what we're talking about, and you can't be bothered to poke around our site looking for the numerous examples of the above behavior, here are some pictures from demonstrations around the United States, courtesy of those small-minded, hateful assholes at godhatesfags.com:
Are these demonstrations as bad as what's going on in the Muslim world right now? Absolutely not. And we certainly aren't saying that all Christians or Muslims are like these fucking morons above. But don't think it can't happen here.
— • —
[ Filed under: % Civil Liberties % Greatest Hits % Religion ]
Aussie Adam, 2006.02.05 (Sun) 05:58 [Link] »
dikkii, 2006.02.05 (Sun) 06:21 [Link] »
MBains, 2006.02.05 (Sun) 07:48 [Link] »
dikkii, 2006.02.05 (Sun) 08:41 [Link] »
MBains, 2006.02.05 (Sun) 09:29 [Link] »
Orac, 2006.02.05 (Sun) 10:11 [Link] »
Fan-man, 2006.02.05 (Sun) 12:11 [Link] »
The Two Percent Company, 2006.02.05 (Sun) 13:21 [Link] »
Crosius, 2006.02.06 (Mon) 15:19 [Link] »
The Two Percent Company, 2006.02.06 (Mon) 17:43 [Link] »
MBains, 2006.02.06 (Mon) 20:51 [Link] »
noisefloor, 2006.02.07 (Tue) 04:36 [Link] »
Mahf, 2006.02.07 (Tue) 04:53 [Link] »
MBains, 2006.02.07 (Tue) 05:23 [Link] »
mahf, 2006.02.07 (Tue) 06:27 [Link] »
MBains, 2006.02.07 (Tue) 06:36 [Link] »
Fan-man, 2006.02.07 (Tue) 10:49 [Link] »
glintir, 2006.02.07 (Tue) 15:54 [Link] »
Tom from the Two Percent Company, 2006.02.07 (Tue) 17:56 [Link] »
PB27, 2006.02.07 (Tue) 18:02 [Link] »
Tom from the Two Percent Company, 2006.02.07 (Tue) 18:14 [Link] »
MBains, 2006.02.07 (Tue) 18:24 [Link] »
PB27, 2006.02.09 (Thu) 11:22 [Link] »
a7mad, 2006.02.13 (Mon) 15:26 [Link] »
Michael Bains, 2006.02.13 (Mon) 15:57 [Link] »
The Two Percent Company, 2006.02.13 (Mon) 18:38 [Link] »
Tom from the Two Percent Company, 2006.02.17 (Fri) 20:53 [Link] »
Blondin, 2006.02.28 (Tue) 13:52 [Link] »
— • —