« Allison DuBois - Even More of a Hypocrite Than Previously Thought • The Rants • Skeptics' Circle #21 »
Win One, Lose One
2005.11.09 (Wed) 23:15
As we learned this morning (initially via Pharyngula), the recent school board elections in Dover, PA yielded a win for science. From the New York Times:
All eight members up for re-election to the Pennsylvania school board that had been sued for introducing the teaching of intelligent design as an alternative to evolution in biology class were swept out of office yesterday by a slate of challengers who campaigned against the intelligent design policy.
...
The election results were a repudiation of the first school district in the nation to order the introduction of intelligent design in a science class curriculum.
So, while the verdict from the recently-concluded trial won't be announced until January, we can take solace in what will hopefully be a very clear message to politicians — if you push creationism, you can kiss your political office goodbye.
Way over in the square states, though, things aren't going quite as swimmingly. Just after reading about the victory above, we also read about the current plight in Kansas (again from Pharyngula). From MSNBC:
Risking the kind of nationwide ridicule it faced six years ago, the Kansas Board of Education approved new public-school science standards Tuesday that cast doubt on the theory of evolution.
...
The new standards say high school students must understand major evolutionary concepts. But they also declare that the basic Darwinian theory that all life had a common origin and that natural chemical processes created the building blocks of life have been challenged in recent years by fossil evidence and molecular biology.
In addition, the board rewrote the definition of science, so that it is no longer limited to the search for natural explanations of phenomena.
Hey, there's a thought. If you want to teach your line of hokey bullshit in science classes but can't get past the fact that it isn't science, just change the definition of science, right? Sadly for these Kansas morons (and happily for the rest of us), that's just not how it works. If it did work that way, though, we'd move to rewrite the definition of "self defense" so that it included defending ourselves against an assault on reason. Then we'd hop out to Kansas and smack these idiots on their heads with a tack hammer.
We also love how they throw in their bogus arguments that evolution has been challenged by recent developments in molecular biology and fossil evidence. Frankly, these creationist morons wouldn't know molecular biology from Ovaltine, so even if recent developments in that field did cast doubt on evolution — which is an absolute fabrication — they would remain blissfully ignorant of that fact. We've seen this argument more times than we can count from proponents of silly pseudoscience. Hell, all the other loons points to "recent scientific evidence" that supports their cause; why should creationism be any different?
There's probably a lot more to say on both of these issues, but we're really tired tonight. Instead, we'll toast the Dover elections, and drown our sorrows over the loss of Kansas. Either way — we're having some drinks.
— • —
[ Filed under: % Civil Liberties % Creationism % Religion ]
Comments (4)
Jesse, 2005.11.10 (Thu) 13:17 [Link] »
The Two Percent Company, 2005.11.15 (Tue) 15:31 [Link] »
Doug Sharp, Head IDiot, 2005.11.15 (Tue) 23:52 [Link] »
The Two Percent Company, 2005.11.16 (Wed) 14:17 [Link] »
— • —
|