2% The Two Percent Company
[ - ]
| Large Type Edition |
[ - ]
[ - ]
| Navigate the Rants


Special Collections
[ - ]
[ - ]
Subscribe to the
2%Co Rants:

Syndicate this site:
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
[ - ]
[ - ]
| The Usual Suspects
On Hiatus
Carnival of the Godless
Skeptics' Circle
Tangled Bank

Gone But Not Forgotten
Lost to the Mists of Time
[ - ]
[ - ]
| Archives (Weekly)
% 2016.11.06 » 2016.11.12
% 2009.04.05 » 2009.04.11
% 2009.03.15 » 2009.03.21
% 2009.03.08 » 2009.03.14
% 2009.03.01 » 2009.03.07
% 2009.02.15 » 2009.02.21
% 2009.01.25 » 2009.01.31
% 2009.01.18 » 2009.01.24
% 2009.01.04 » 2009.01.10
% 2008.12.21 » 2008.12.27
% 2008.11.16 » 2008.11.22
% 2008.11.09 » 2008.11.15

Archives (Monthly)
% 2016 November
% 2009 April
% 2009 March
% 2009 February
% 2009 January
% 2008 December
% 2008 November
% 2008 October
% 2008 September
% 2008 July
% 2008 June
% 2008 April
% 2008 January
% 2007 November
% 2007 October
% 2007 August
% 2007 July
% 2007 June
% 2007 May
% 2007 April
% 2007 March
% 2007 February
% 2007 January
% 2006 December
% 2006 November
% 2006 October
% 2006 September
% 2006 August
% 2006 July
% 2006 June
% 2006 May
% 2006 April
% 2006 March
% 2006 February
% 2006 January
% 2005 December
% 2005 November
% 2005 October
% 2005 September
% 2005 August
% 2005 July
% 2005 June
% 2005 May
% 2005 April
% 2005 March
% 2005 February
% 2005 January
% 2004 December
[ - ]
[ - ]
« Skeptics' Circle #20 The RantsEinzige's Roommate is Not God »

Dover Watch - Buckingham Caught in Lie
2005.10.28 (Fri) 21:12

You know, we would have loved to say "we told you so" when we read the news that William Buckingham, the apparent senior moron for the Dover School Board, had to contradict his own sworn deposition from earlier this year, in which he had claimed that he never referred to creationism or religion in his bid to shove evolution aside in favor of intelligent design. But quite frankly, it was so obvious that this was coming that we can't even get excited by it.

What was reported way back in June 2004 when this all started? Well, the York Dispatch had this to say on June 15, 2004:

Opponents' position: William Buckingham, a board member and head of the curriculum committee, who brought up the issue last week, stood by his opposition to the [teachers' recommended biology] book and the separation of church and state.

"Nearly 2,000 years ago someone died on a cross for us; shouldn't we have the courage to stand up for him?" he asked.

Board members Alan Bonsell and Noel Wenrich agreed with Buckingham, saying creationism should be taught to balance evolution.

Buckingham apologized for offending any teachers or residents of the community with his remarks but was unapologetic about his belief that the country was founded on Christianity and not other religions and that a "liberal agenda was chipping away at the rights of Christians in this country."

His remarks were echoed by his wife, Charlotte Buckingham, who said that teaching evolution was in direct opposition to God's teachings and that the people of Dover could not in good conscience allow the district to teach anything but creationism.

Pretty straightforward, isn't it? And what was the story from the School Board in January in their deposition? Again, the York Dispatch fills us in:

Attorney Eric Rothschild of the Philadelphia-based law firm Pepper Hamilton said the decision not to seek the restraining order came because of what was said in depositions this week by school officials, who were questioned about the origin of the curriculum change and statements by board members that were religious in nature.

Rothschild said that during those depositions Monday, district officials said they either had no memory of statements that were reported in The York Dispatch and York Daily Record during June 2004, or flatly denied that they were made.

Those who disputed the statements were: board president Sheila Harkins, former board president Alan Bonsell, former curriculum committee chair William Buckingham and superintendent Richard Nilsen.


For example, as reported on June 15, 2004, by The York Dispatch and by the York Daily Record, Buckingham said "Nearly 2,000 years ago someone died on a cross for us; shouldn't we have the courage to stand up for him?" at a June 14 school board meeting.

Buckingham's denial: Buckingham said he never made that statement in reference to the evolution debate, but in reference to a resolution the board passed to support the "under God" phrase in the Pledge of Allegiance in November 2003. His testimony was supported by that of Sheila Harkins.

However, the school officials also said that they had never asked the local papers to retract or correct any reports made.

To anyone with even a modicum of intelligence, the "we were taken out of context" argument is pure nonsense. First of all, the people echoing Buckingham's remarks (like his wife) are quite clearly talking about evolution — not the pledge. In addition, the very fact that Christian dogma entered into a discussion about public school curricula at all is damning in and of itself. As we said in January:

It is becoming increasingly obvious why the Discovery Institute is distancing itself from Dover — not only do they have a weak case, they appear to be assholes whose cover stories are about as well-formed as those of a three year old caught with his hand in the cookie jar.

Well, the plaintiffs called Willie Buckingham to the stand this week, and what happened? From MSNBC (thanks to Ed Brayton for the link):

A former school board member who denied advocating that creationism be taught alongside evolution in high-school biology classes changed his story Thursday, after lawyers in a federal courtroom played a TV news clip that recorded him making such a comment.

William Buckingham explained the discrepancy by saying that he "misspoke."


Buckingham, who led the board's curriculum committee when it approved the policy a year ago, confirmed Thursday that he said during a June 2004 board meeting that the biology textbook is "laced with Darwinism." The clip that was shown later in the day came from an interview that he gave to a news crew from WPMT-TV in York later in the month.

"It's OK to teach Darwin," he said in the interview, "but you have to balance it with something else, such as creationism."

Oops. Not only did lots of people hear this moron spouting his Christian bullshit in the board meeting, not only did the two local papers report what he had said, he also appeared on television saying the same thing. Seriously, how fucking stupid is this guy?

What defense did he offer for the words he now (finally) admits he said?

Asked to explain by a lawyer for the plaintiffs, Buckingham said he felt "ambushed" by the camera crew as he walked across a parking lot to his car and that he had been consciously trying to avoid mentioning creationism.

"I had it in my mind to make sure not to talk about creationism. I had it on my mind. I was like a deer in the headlights. I misspoke," he told U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III, who is presiding over the non-jury trial.

Ah, so he admits that he was thinking about creationism when he came up with his plan, and that he was trying to refrain from mentioning it. Gee, Willie, if you have to struggle so hard to avoid using the term "creationism," what does that suggest? First, that the creationism on your brain was your motivation for trying to shove intelligent design bullshit down your students' throats. Second, you damn well knew that what you were trying to do is illegal, so you tried to hide your true motives. And third, you're a moron of incalculable magnitude if you managed to erupt in this full-tilt super-Christy Christian diatribe while trying to avoid even the merest mention of creationism. Hell, that was the word you used most frequently throughout the meeting, by all accounts! And we thought Jesus didn't like liars.

For those wishing to follow the trial (as we have been doing), we recommend checking in often with the Panda's Thumb for updates. Ed Brayton and PZ Myers can be counted on for in-depth analysis on their own sites as well. Us? We'll be choking back our own bilious vomit as we watch these idiots continue to march headlong into stupidity.

— • —

In case you missed them, read our other Rants on Dover.

— • —
[  Filed under: % Civil Liberties  % Creationism  % Greatest Hits  % Religion  ]

Comments (7)

French Leave, 2005.10.29 (Sat) 02:18 [Link] »

"For those wishing to follow the trial ..."

Red State Rabble is another excellent resource.

p.s. Ooh, pretty Halloween colors!

Ford, 2005.10.30 (Sun) 17:36 [Link] »

Heh, funny. Yeah, same old crap, but just thought you might like to see it straight from the ass itself.

Rockstar, 2005.10.31 (Mon) 10:14 [Link] »

This is my personal favorite quote from the trial:

Lawyer: What is the mechanism that intelligent design proposes?

Michael Behe: And I wonder, could — am I permitted to know what I replied to your question the first time?

This motherfucker can't even hold his own with a lawyer. Probably because "goddidit" is an argument the IDiots can't use in court...

The Retropolitan, 2005.11.01 (Tue) 11:37 [Link] »

Too bad I missed out on being Michael Behe for Halloween this year. I would've carried a Bible and a thought bubble sign that said "This costume was created out of nothing by God."

The Two Percent Company, 2005.11.02 (Wed) 22:13 [Link] »

French: Yep, that's another good site to track the case. The ACLU of Pennsylvania also has a blog to keep any interested parties updated, and they have full transcripts of the trial online as well.

Ford: We've been checking in on the Dover web site from time to time, and the sheer pig-headed stupidity of these people is incredible. We can't wait until they lose.

Rockstar: That's priceless! You'd think that by not having to learn any actual science to argue for his "scientific theory," Behe would have more time to at least memorize his own line of bullshit. But, no. As this trial progresses, it becomes more and more apparent that all of the people on the other side are, quite literally, idiots. Thanks for the laugh!

Retro: See, that costume isn't precise enough. No one would know if you were Behe, or Perkins, or Dobson, or Hovind, or Robertson, or Falwell, or...well, any number of the nameless, faceless rabble of bible-thumping morons who are responsible for 51% of the country believing in the biblical account of creation over evolution. Maybe a "My name is Behe" sticker...?

bobby, 2005.12.22 (Thu) 17:00 [Link] »

Damn, (no pun inteded) I guess when they say "Put ye on the mind of the Lord" they didn't mean William Buckingham. I wonder, if the lord made everything over billions of years, if he himself believes in evolution. I somehow suspect that he does. Word to the mustard, mothers.

Tom from the Two Percent Company, 2006.01.05 (Thu) 18:43 [Link] »

It's a strange Christian world in which evolution is eville, but lying through your teeth is perfectly okay. Not to mention the fact that this moron was lying to pretend that he did not do what he did for Jesus. Isn't that the bad thing that Judas supposedly did? Well, one of the bad things.

— • —

[ - ]

Terms of Use — • — Privacy Policy — • — FAQ
[ - ]
| Protecting our Civil Liberties
EFF: Support Bloggers' Rights!

Bullshit Busters
JREFSkeptic's Dictionary

[ - ]
[ - ]
[ - ]
[ - ]
Buy 2%Co Products
2%Co Stores

Visit the 2%Co Wish List
[ - ]
[ - ]
[ - ]
[ - ]
[ - ]
[ - ]
| Where can you find 2%Co?

Site MeterGlobe of Blogs
Atheism OnlineThe Truth Laid Bear

2%Co Search Rankings

Link to our Rants
2%Co Rants

Link to our Allison DuBois: Debunked! collection
Allison DuBois: Debunked! (2%Co)

The 2%Co Rants powered by
[ - ]