2% The Two Percent Company
[ - ]
| Large Type Edition |
[ - ]
[ - ]
| Navigate the Rants


Special Collections
[ - ]
[ - ]
Subscribe to the
2%Co Rants:

Syndicate this site:
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
[ - ]
[ - ]
| The Usual Suspects
On Hiatus
Carnival of the Godless
Skeptics' Circle
Tangled Bank

Gone But Not Forgotten
Lost to the Mists of Time
[ - ]
[ - ]
| Archives (Weekly)
% 2016.11.06 » 2016.11.12
% 2009.04.05 » 2009.04.11
% 2009.03.15 » 2009.03.21
% 2009.03.08 » 2009.03.14
% 2009.03.01 » 2009.03.07
% 2009.02.15 » 2009.02.21
% 2009.01.25 » 2009.01.31
% 2009.01.18 » 2009.01.24
% 2009.01.04 » 2009.01.10
% 2008.12.21 » 2008.12.27
% 2008.11.16 » 2008.11.22
% 2008.11.09 » 2008.11.15

Archives (Monthly)
% 2016 November
% 2009 April
% 2009 March
% 2009 February
% 2009 January
% 2008 December
% 2008 November
% 2008 October
% 2008 September
% 2008 July
% 2008 June
% 2008 April
% 2008 January
% 2007 November
% 2007 October
% 2007 August
% 2007 July
% 2007 June
% 2007 May
% 2007 April
% 2007 March
% 2007 February
% 2007 January
% 2006 December
% 2006 November
% 2006 October
% 2006 September
% 2006 August
% 2006 July
% 2006 June
% 2006 May
% 2006 April
% 2006 March
% 2006 February
% 2006 January
% 2005 December
% 2005 November
% 2005 October
% 2005 September
% 2005 August
% 2005 July
% 2005 June
% 2005 May
% 2005 April
% 2005 March
% 2005 February
% 2005 January
% 2004 December
[ - ]
[ - ]
« How Many Licks Does it Take to Get to the Center of a Creationist? The RantsFilibuster "Victory" Leaves a Nasty Aftertaste »

Stem Cell Research and Willful Ignorance of the Facts
2005.05.20 (Fri) 23:58

Because of the United States' policy to not fund embryonic stem cell research, it has been apparent that as long as the religious right is in power, any advances in that field will necessarily come from other countries. So it wasn't a surprise to see the following AP article:

Just a few years ago, Michigan State University scientist Jose Cibelli was considered the leading expert on cloning human embryos to treat and study disease. Now, there's no debate that the cloning king is Hwang Woo-suk of Seoul National University.

On Thursday, Hwang announced yet again that he had successfully cloned human embryos, this time extracting stem cells from embryos created using the DNA of sick and injured patients. It was the second time in a little more than a year that Hwang had successfully cloned. He remains the only acknowledged scientist to have done so.

Hwang is succeeding where the United States is failing because generous South Korean government support helped him create an efficient cloning factory. In his lab, an army of researchers trained in specialized individual tasks mans a high-tech assembly line that often operates 24 hours a day, Cibelli and others say.

In contrast, the few U.S. researchers eager to clone are left scrambling for funds and staff and must contend with legal vagaries as well as staunch opposition from President Bush, who reaffirmed his position on Friday with a veto threat.

You could say this makes us sad — but a more accurate description would be downright furious. Quite clearly, Bush is willfully ignoring the facts of embryonic stem cell research in order to cater to his über-religious base, and the rest of us will be forced to pay for his actions. From another AP article, we see Bush's opposition to a bipartisan bill being proposed which would partly relax the ban:

"I'm very concerned about cloning," Bush told reporters in the Oval Office. "I worry about a world in which cloning becomes acceptable."

"I made it very clear to the Congress that the use of federal money, taxpayers' money to promote science which destroys life in order to save life is — I'm against that. And therefore, if the bill does that, I will veto it."

This sound an awful lot like a creationist argument. Notice how he refers to the process as "cloning" which evokes images of pod people and using clones as slaves. This dishonest manipulation (obviously drilled into Bush by his sound-byte experts) sounds a little bit like creationists insisting upon referring to evolution as "Darwinism," a moniker meant to sound dogmatic in order to paint science as just another faith-based belief.

We also can't help but notice that his rationale for opposing this bill (and we use the term "rationale" very loosely here) basically amounts to "I'm against that," with a liberal dollop of his (always paradoxical) "culture of life" bullshit. Yeah, what a great set of reasons to stifle good science and the strong chance of multitudes of medical breakthroughs.

Let's take a look at the bill in question, and why any rational person with or without any scientific education has no logical excuse for opposing it:

[The proposed] bill would lift Bush's ban on using federal dollars to do research on embryonic stem cell lines developed after August 2001. The president's veto threat drew immediate reaction from sponsors of the bipartisan bill, Reps. Mike Castle, R-Del., and Diana DeGette, D-Colo.

Castle said the legislation would not allow the cloning of embryos or embryo destruction. Instead, it would let government-funded researchers work with stem cells culled from embryos left over from fertility treatments.

"The bottom line is when a couple has decided to discard their excess embryos, they are either going to be discarded as medical waste or they can be donated for research," Castle said.

DeGette protested too. "It's disappointing that the president would threaten to use his first veto on a bill that holds promise for cures to diseases that affect millions of Americans," DeGette said. "Support for expanding federal stem cell research in an ethical manner remains strong in Congress."

This approach is not new. Reasonable people have been asking to use these IVF leftovers for research purposes for quite some time. It is an undisputed fact that, if they aren't used, they will eventually be destroyed.

We'll say that one more time — if you go in for IVF treatment, excess embryos are produced as part of the process. Once your IVF treatment is completed, the remaining embryos are frozen until you notify the clinic that you no longer want them — at which point they are discarded as medical waste. Why the hell would any sane person oppose the use of these embryos and instead insist that they be destroyed, thereby serving no purpose whatsoever?

We can understand why some people oppose the creation of new human embryos for the sole purpose of scientific research. We don't agree with them, but we can understand their position. But opposing the use of already created embryos that are currently destined for the trash is just willful ignorance. And that's precisely the policy of our president — and by extension our country.

We don't want to hear about adult stem cells, or stem cells culled from umbilical cords — they don't have the same potential for the wide range of tissue growth that embryonic stem cells have, so they aren't an acceptable substitute. Nor is the contaminated pre-2001 line that Bush keeps reminding us he has oh-so-magnanimously allowed to be used for research. Put bluntly, there is no logical reason for the medically stifling policy being pushed by the Bush administration — it is just plain willfull ignorance.

We'll end with the sentiments of Dr. Janet Rowley of the University of Chicago, a member of the President's Council on Bioethics. She sums it up pretty nicely.

"We in the United States, again because of ideology, are sitting back and watching," she said, adding that she hoped the South Korean work would pressure Congress to take a "more responsible position on federal support for the use and investigation of human embryonic stem cell lines."

Given Bush's open (and willfully ignorant) condemnation of South Korea's progress, we somehow doubt that Dr. Rowley's hope will soon be realized.

— • —
[  Filed under: % Government & Politics  % Science & Technology  ]

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.twopercentco.com/rants/tpc-trkbk.cgi/154

Comments (1)

DC, 2005.05.23 (Mon) 10:54 [Link] »

That really does piss you off. How many people will suffer due to their misguided ideology?

— • —

— • —

Enter your comment below

Name —
E-mail —
Remember me?
Subscribe to this Rant? (We'll notify you of new comments.)

Comments —
(Allowed HTML: a href, b, i, br, ol, ul, li, blockquote)

Please Post only once; if you do not see your comment immediately, Refresh the Rant page.
Your comment will autopreview above, if you have Javascript enabled.

Read the Two Percent Company's Comment Policy before diving into the deep end.

To subscribe to this Rant without commenting, fill in your e-mail address below:

[ - ]

Terms of Use — • — Privacy Policy — • — FAQ
[ - ]
| Protecting our Civil Liberties
EFF: Support Bloggers' Rights!

Bullshit Busters
JREFSkeptic's Dictionary

[ - ]
[ - ]
[ - ]
[ - ]
Buy 2%Co Products
2%Co Stores

Visit the 2%Co Wish List
[ - ]
[ - ]

Recommended by us:

Recommended to us:

[ - ]
[ - ]
[ - ]
[ - ]
| Where can you find 2%Co?

Site MeterGlobe of Blogs
Atheism OnlineThe Truth Laid Bear

2%Co Search Rankings

Link to our Rants
2%Co Rants

Link to our Allison DuBois: Debunked! collection
Allison DuBois: Debunked! (2%Co)

The 2%Co Rants powered by
[ - ]